Scope and contribution
See what the project involved and what the candidate’s material says they personally owned.
A résumé outlines experience. Portfolios, case studies, and work samples can show how it was applied. Bring that evidence into the role’s evaluation and see what it supports.

Alex — Design-system case study
1 supporting material reviewed
The case study strengthens the evidence of cross-team delivery. Individual strategic ownership remains less clear.
Look for the details that show how a candidate’s experience applies to your role.
See what the project involved and what the candidate’s material says they personally owned.
Examine the approach, constraints, and reasoning behind the work.
Look for evidence of results. Keep claims that still need validation visible.
TrueRole discovers resource links in the résumé—including embedded PDF links—then explores accessible destinations for relevant projects, case studies, and other supporting work.
Résumé links, portfolio URLs, and resources your team adds.
Relevant project pages, case studies, documents, and other linked work.
Materials prioritized for the role, with sources and access status kept visible.
Discovery follows relevant shared resources within supported access and processing limits. Review status shows which materials were accessible and analyzed.
Add files or links that show the candidate’s work. See their review status and how they contribute to the evaluation.
Supporting evidence
Resume, portfolio, and supporting sources reviewed for this candidate.

Alex — Design-system case study
PDF and Word documents, PowerPoint presentations, Excel and CSV data, PNG and JPEG images, plain text and Markdown, and supported source-code files.
Portfolios, case studies, public repositories, articles, technical documentation, research papers, demos, and linked video or talk resources.
Alex’s case study supports delivery across three teams, while strategic ownership remains open. Read the cited passage to see why and prepare a focused follow-up.
Portfolio · Supporting evidence
"Rolled out shared components across three product teams. Worked with team leads to plan the migration and document adoption."
Provides context, rather than direct evidence of this requirement.
It examines accessible supporting materials—such as portfolios, case studies, and work samples—against the role’s requirements. Findings can add detail about scope, decisions, delivery, and outcomes that a résumé alone may not establish.
Yes. Add files or links to the candidate review, including materials that were not discovered automatically. Your team can also provide accessible versions of restricted sources.
No. New evidence may strengthen a finding, reveal a gap, or leave the evaluation unchanged. The deeper-analysis summary explains what the review added and what remains open.
TrueRole shows when a source could not be reviewed. Your team can provide an accessible version or ask the candidate for context. Missing access means missing evidence; it does not establish a lack of ability.
Explore Deeper Analysis with the kinds of roles and materials your team reviews.